<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SugarSync vs. Mozy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/</link>
	<description>Incoherent chatter on issues related to science, computing, and philosophy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hypercubed</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-53294</link>
		<dc:creator>hypercubed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-53294</guid>
		<description>$25 a years is fine, $25 + $50 per year is too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$25 a years is fine, $25 + $50 per year is too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-53216</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-53216</guid>
		<description>&lt;&lt; I’m tempted to use SugarSync and Mozy together as a Sync/Backup tag team but $25 a year for SugarSync and $50 a year for Mozy I can’t justify it.&#160; &gt;&gt;

&#160;

I see this logic again and again and I just can&#039;t understand it.&#160; You see value in the combined solution and you get utility from it, but you won&#039;t pay $25/*YEAR* (not per month, but per year) for it?!?!

&#160;

I don&#039;t get it.
  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&lt; I’m tempted to use SugarSync and Mozy together as a Sync/Backup tag team but $25 a year for SugarSync and $50 a year for Mozy I can’t justify it.&nbsp; &gt;&gt;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I see this logic again and again and I just can&#8217;t understand it.&nbsp; You see value in the combined solution and you get utility from it, but you won&#8217;t pay $25/*YEAR* (not per month, but per year) for it?!?!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-52865</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-52865</guid>
		<description>My first day using SugarSync (free 2BG version). It&#039;s early days I have been very impressed so far. It syncs in real time and upload speeds are fantastic. The interface looks great and is overall very user friendly app.
  

Previously I tried the hugely overrated Mozy whichtook forever to upload files, also they don&#039;t provide file revisions, so your screwed if you want to retrieve older revised files going back more than 30 days. I also tried Memopal which was totally hopeless and didn&#039;t even work, kept giving internal server error when trying to upload files....whatever that is!

SugarSync (so far) is superb IMO.
  


  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first day using SugarSync (free 2BG version). It&#8217;s early days I have been very impressed so far. It syncs in real time and upload speeds are fantastic. The interface looks great and is overall very user friendly app.</p>
<p>Previously I tried the hugely overrated Mozy whichtook forever to upload files, also they don&#8217;t provide file revisions, so your screwed if you want to retrieve older revised files going back more than 30 days. I also tried Memopal which was totally hopeless and didn&#8217;t even work, kept giving internal server error when trying to upload files&#8230;.whatever that is!</p>
<p>SugarSync (so far) is superb IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougc</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-52677</link>
		<dc:creator>dougc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-52677</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m from a competitor to both Mozy and SugarSync, but we have a different slant on the whole market. 
 
We believe that customers need the flexibility to backup to local data stores &lt;i&gt;and &lt;/i&gt;multiple online data stores.&#160; While our current release targets only Amazon S3, we have established the necessary framework to rapidly integrate other providers. 
 
If you&#039;d like to give us a try, you can download here: 
  http://backazon.com/downloads 
 
We offer a free 30 day trial (Amazon charges not included), but we will work with reviewers who need more time to complete their review. 
   
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from a competitor to both Mozy and SugarSync, but we have a different slant on the whole market. </p>
<p>We believe that customers need the flexibility to backup to local data stores <i>and </i>multiple online data stores.&nbsp; While our current release targets only Amazon S3, we have established the necessary framework to rapidly integrate other providers. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to give us a try, you can download here:<br />
  <a href="http://backazon.com/downloads" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/backazon.com/downloads?referer=');">http://backazon.com/downloads</a> </p>
<p>We offer a free 30 day trial (Amazon charges not included), but we will work with reviewers who need more time to complete their review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sp</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-52607</link>
		<dc:creator>Sp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-52607</guid>
		<description>Very nice post, thank you.

What I don&#039;t like about Mozy and the reason why I changed it to IDrive.com is that, even that it is a backup solution, it actually syncs your files with their servers.

This is *really* a problem and a security concern because (like your example of the corrupted file) if you accidentally delete one of your important files and you don&#039;t notice the deletion, it will be deleted from Mozy&#039;s servers within a month or so.

If you notice the deletion, that is no problem, you just restore the file; but it you don&#039;t notice (and it could happen) you may loose your file.

This doesn&#039;t happen with idrive.com and it has the same or better pricing.

Thank you.-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice post, thank you.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t like about Mozy and the reason why I changed it to IDrive.com is that, even that it is a backup solution, it actually syncs your files with their servers.</p>
<p>This is *really* a problem and a security concern because (like your example of the corrupted file) if you accidentally delete one of your important files and you don&#8217;t notice the deletion, it will be deleted from Mozy&#8217;s servers within a month or so.</p>
<p>If you notice the deletion, that is no problem, you just restore the file; but it you don&#8217;t notice (and it could happen) you may loose your file.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t happen with idrive.com and it has the same or better pricing.</p>
<p>Thank you.-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedfreek</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-52379</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedfreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-52379</guid>
		<description>Looks like Sugarsync has versioning now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Sugarsync has versioning now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michelle79</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-52167</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-52167</guid>
		<description>I discovered a Memopal (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.memopal.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.memopal.com&lt;/a&gt;) &quot;cutting edge solution for online
  backup&quot;
 
They merged online backup, online storage and file sharing services into one product.
 
If you try this service you will notice that (contrary to most competitors):
  - You can access your files in (true) real time with a web browser
  - They really offer 250 GB (some competitors offer a fake unlimited web
  space, they say &quot;fair use&quot;)
  - You can share a file or many files with the 1-click-share functionality
  - Some of your files will be uploaded very very fast (turboupload)
  - The service and website are in 10 different languages
 
I&#039;ve also found two useful guide to online backup on Wikipedia:
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_backup&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_backup&lt;/a&gt; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered a Memopal (<a href="http://www.memopal.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.memopal.com?referer=');">http://www.memopal.com</a>) &#8220;cutting edge solution for online<br />
  backup&#8221;</p>
<p>They merged online backup, online storage and file sharing services into one product.</p>
<p>If you try this service you will notice that (contrary to most competitors):<br />
  &#8211; You can access your files in (true) real time with a web browser<br />
  &#8211; They really offer 250 GB (some competitors offer a fake unlimited web<br />
  space, they say &#8220;fair use&#8221;)<br />
  &#8211; You can share a file or many files with the 1-click-share functionality<br />
  &#8211; Some of your files will be uploaded very very fast (turboupload)<br />
  &#8211; The service and website are in 10 different languages</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also found two useful guide to online backup on Wikipedia:<br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_backup" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_backup?referer=');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_backup</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daren</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-50328</link>
		<dc:creator>Daren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-50328</guid>
		<description>Last but not least...filename SEARCH.&#160; Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last but not least&#8230;filename SEARCH.&nbsp; Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daren</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-50327</link>
		<dc:creator>Daren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-50327</guid>
		<description>Jean-Gabriel - 
 
I would like to see an option that STOPS a download (manaul override for, say, a 75MB file when you want the 1MB first); another way to do this - and another suggestion, by the way - is to allow PRIORITIZATION of files to be download.&#160; Thanks for letting me jump into the fray on your blog...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean-Gabriel &#8211; </p>
<p>I would like to see an option that STOPS a download (manaul override for, say, a 75MB file when you want the 1MB first); another way to do this &#8211; and another suggestion, by the way &#8211; is to allow PRIORITIZATION of files to be download.&nbsp; Thanks for letting me jump into the fray on your blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hypercubed</title>
		<link>http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/comment-page-1/#comment-49750</link>
		<dc:creator>hypercubed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hypercubed.com/archives/2008/05/16/sugarsync-vs-mozy/#comment-49750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jean-Gabriel, 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I look forward to the day you add this. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;James, 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been trying Syncplicity. While I don&#039;t have any specific complaints/issues I prefer SurgarSync. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean-Gabriel,
</p>
<p>I look forward to the day you add this.
</p>
<p>James,
</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying Syncplicity. While I don&#8217;t have any specific complaints/issues I prefer SurgarSync.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
